Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of semen quality parameters betwen preoperative and postoperative group

From: Preoperative semen quality is superior to the quality shortly after orchiectomy in patients with testicular germ cell tumour – a retrospective study from two centres in Germany

  

before orchiectomy

after orchiectomy

p-value

ejaculate volume (ml)

n

163

242

 
 

median

3

2

 
 

Q1; Q3

2; 4.2

2; 3

< 0.0001

proportion EV < 1.4 ml (%)

n

163

242

 
 

%

6.1%

8.3%

 
 

95% CI

3.0%; 11.0%

5.1%; 12.5%

0.4223

total sperm count (n)

n

163

242

 
 

median

56.9

13

 
 

Q1; Q3

13.7; 126.6

2; 48

< 0.0001

TSC, proportion < 39 × 10 6

n

163

242

 
 

%

41.7%

70.7%

 
 

95% CI

34.1%; 49.7%

64.6%; 76.3%

< 0.0001

proportion azoospermia

n

163

242

 
 

%

4.9%

14.9%

 
 

95% CI

2.1%; 9.4%

10.6%; 20.0%

0.0016

progressive motility (%)

n

n = 157

n = 221

 
 

median

40

25

 
 

Q1; Q3

25; 51.3

0.3; 36.5

< 0.0001

proportion motility < 30%

n

n = 157

n = 221

 
 

%

36.9%

67.0%

 
 

95% CI

29.4%; 45.0%

60.3%; 73.1%

< 0.0001

motility < 30% & TSC < 39 × 10 6

n

157

221

 
 

%

28.7%

51.1%

 
 

95% CI

21.7%; 36.4%

44.3%; 57.9%

< 0.0001

motility < 30% & TSC ≥ 39 × 10 6

n

157

221

 
 

%

8.3%

15.8%

 
 

95% CI

4.5%; 13.7%

11.3%; 21.3%

0.0297

motility ≥ 30% & TSC < 39 × 10 6

n

157

221

 
 

%

12.7%

20.8%

 
 

95% CI

8.0%; 19.0%

15.7%; 26.8%

0.0415

  1. This table shows the main results of the study: all semen parameters are significantly more favourable in the preoperative group, with the exception of proportion of ejaculate volume <1.4 ml. Statistical comparisons were made with the chi square test for binary variables and with the Wilcoxon two sample test for quantitative variables. EV ejaculate volume; TSC total sperm count; CI confidence interval; Q1 first quartile, Q3 third quartile